Heroes season finale niggle
May. 22nd, 2007 06:35 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It was an hour or so after viewing the Heroes finale that a little niggle stuck in my mind.
Apparently it's better for Nathan to sacrifice himself so that he and Peter literally go out in a blaze of glory…than it would be for Claire to kill Peter temporarily (he regenerates just like she does, and Ma Petrelli actually made a point of saying that just a few minutes earlier) to turn off the magic glowy hands of doom.
That kinda bothers me.
(Also, I wish that Christopher Eccleston had been around, as he was in the original dream sequence. Pity.)
It's partly made up for by the fact that we don't know how things shook out. It could be that neither Nathan nor Peter died up there; Peter could have shoved Nathan away partway up and gone the rest of the way on his own, and Peter of course wouldn't die, or would regenerate if he did. Man, won't Peter feel bad if he doesn't die but Nathan did?
Apparently it's better for Nathan to sacrifice himself so that he and Peter literally go out in a blaze of glory…than it would be for Claire to kill Peter temporarily (he regenerates just like she does, and Ma Petrelli actually made a point of saying that just a few minutes earlier) to turn off the magic glowy hands of doom.
That kinda bothers me.
(Also, I wish that Christopher Eccleston had been around, as he was in the original dream sequence. Pity.)
It's partly made up for by the fact that we don't know how things shook out. It could be that neither Nathan nor Peter died up there; Peter could have shoved Nathan away partway up and gone the rest of the way on his own, and Peter of course wouldn't die, or would regenerate if he did. Man, won't Peter feel bad if he doesn't die but Nathan did?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-22 02:09 pm (UTC)I bet both are back next season.