You know, the dictionary definition of "stimulus" is "something that rouses or incites to activity."
I hereby propose we should stop using the term "economic stimulus" and instead call it the "poking-the-economy-with-a-stick package."
I hereby propose we should stop using the term "economic stimulus" and instead call it the "poking-the-economy-with-a-stick package."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-15 06:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-15 08:45 pm (UTC)And it was the Bush sockpuppet that proposed it and a congress desperate for the appearance of doing something about an economy that has been royally raped by three years of trillion-dollar war, tax giveaways, and unfair but "free" trade causing jobs to evaporate here without actually replacing them with anything, while screwing the economies of other countries and undermining the monetary unit.
It's another bribe, "Here, money, go play somewhere else, Daddy is having his cocktail."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-15 10:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-16 12:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-16 03:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-16 03:18 am (UTC)Taking the $600 this year just means you can't take the $600 next year. (http://robotech-master.livejournal.com/351622.html?thread=309638) And according to the Time Value of Money, an amount of money in your hands now is always better than the exact same amount in your hands next year. Interest and all that.
What this means is that people who don't qualify based on 2007's return could take steps to bring themselves into compliance based on 2008's return.
Pegged it
Already heard of (Walmart?) some store offering to add 10% to the total check if you cash it into a store gift card.
Yeah. Its my own damn fault I can't read the fine print and make sure the loan rates were legit. My own fault. Feh.